Figurative vs Literal Language and the Lord's Supper

“And as they were eating, Jesus took bread, and blessed, and brake it; and he gave to the disciples, and said, Take, eat; this is my body. And he took a cup, and gave thanks, and gave to them, saying, Drink ye all of it; for this is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many unto remission of sins.” Matthew 26:26-28

One of the most significant sources of confusion in Bible interpretation is when individuals will interpret figurative language as literal. Webster’s Dictionary defines figurative language like this: “Figurative language refers to words or phrases that are meaningful, but not literally true.” In addition. We might think of this by simple expressions in the Bible. The church is the body of Christ as we spoke of last Sunday (Eph 1:22-23, 4:4. 5:23). Should we interpret the church as the literal, physical body of Christ? Do we transform into Jesus when we follow him? If so, what happens when I sin against God? I want to illustrate this point by speaking about a variety of errors that come from taking language which is clearly figurative literally.

Is it Literally Flesh and Blood?

The Roman Catholic religion teaches the doctrine of Transubstantiation. During the Eucharist (Lord’s Supper/Communion), their belief is that the bread and the wine is transformed into the literal body and blood of Christ. This belief is derived from Matthew 26:26-28. We can answer this by asking some serious questions. When Jesus said this is my body, did He literally hold His flesh in His hands? Did He drain His literal blood from His veins into the cup? If we were to take this literally, then His blood was shed prior to the cross and His body was already given. Furthermore, Jesus said the cup was the blood of the new covenant. Was the cup literally the New Testament? If it was, it was not literal blood.

What Does This Teaching Imply?

Jesus used figurative language often; the Bible contains prophetic language that describes figures. Jesus used the figure of bread to describe Himself in John 6:51, “1 I am the living bread which came down out of heaven: if any man eat of this bread, he shall live for ever: yea and the bread which I will give is my flesh, for the life of the world.” Was Jesus literal bread? No, He was not. Yet, Christ said in John 6:56, “He that eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood abideth in me, and I in him.” To suggest that Jesus intended for anyone in His time or thereafter to drink blood and eat flesh is to say that Christ called brethren to do things forbidden (drink blood, Acts 15:28-29). It also makes Jesus a teacher of cannibalism. In another instance, the Lord says, “And if thy right hand causeth thee to stumble, cut it off, and cast it from thee: for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and not thy whole body go into hell” Matt. 5:30). If people took the entire Bible as literal, we would have a lot more amputated religious folk in this world.

The True, Literal Purpose of Communion

The Lord’s Supper is a memorial in which we come together to remember the death of our Lord. We remember that He gave His body and blood for the remission of our sin. “For as often as ye eat this bread, and drink the cup, ye proclaim the Lord’s death till he come” (1 Cor 11:26). We must not miss the literal purpose of this act of worship because of the figurative language used by the Lord to describe it.

Grace and Peace,

R.D. Beavers

Don't Raise an Ahaz

Twenty years old was Ahaz when he began to reign; and he reigned sixteen years in Jerusalem: and he did not that which was right in the eyes of Jehovah his God, like David his father. But he walked in the way of the kings of Israel, yea, and made his son to pass through the fire, according to the abominations of the nations, whom Jehovah cast out from before the children of Israel. And he sacrificed and burnt incense in the high places, and on the hills, and under every green tree . 2 Kings 16:2-4 When was the first time you drove a car? What about the first time you jumped off a diving board or gave a speech? After that first time, it certainly became easier. What about the first lie you told? Did it become easier? King Ahaz of Judah was evil and far from the example of David. Ahaz was the first to offer child sacrifices to t...

Jehoiakim and Enemies

“Surely at the commandment of Jehovah came this upon Judah, to remove them out of his sight, for the sins of Manasseh, according to all that he did, and also for the innocent blood that he shed; for he filled Jerusalem with innocent blood: and Jehovah would not pardon.” 2 Kings 24:3-4 Jehoiakim king of Judah was the son of Jehoahaz who chose to do evil and die in Egypt a slave of Pharoah-Necoh. Jehoiakim did not learn from this, and he chose to do evil in his own right (cf. 2 Kings 23:37). He, for a time, subjugated himself to Nebuchadnezzar but turned and rebelled against him (cf. 2 Kings 24:1). Nebuchadnezzar was not the only problem for Jehoiakim. Due to his rebellion, Chaldeans, Assyrians, Ammonites, and Moabites all came after him, and God said it would happen. Jehoiakim chose this, God allowed the Punishment The sin of Judah was nothing new. It was an ongoing practice that was carried out by the king and his people. God was true to His Word, and, despite the warnin...

Abijah and Totality

Now in the eighteenth year of king Jeroboam the son of Nebat reigned Abijam (also Abijah) over Judah.Three years reigned he in Jerusalem. And his mother's name was Maachah, the daughter of Abishalom. And he walked in all the sins of his father, which he had done before him: and his heart was not perfect with the LORD his God, as the heart of David his father. 1 Kings 15:1-3 Do you ever wonder how someone who gets things mostly right can still be so wrong? It is mind-boggling if we do not consider that God judges man in totality. From our text above, it is hard to see anything good that can be said about Abijam (Abijah) son of Rehoboam. After all, it is evident that he walked in all the sins of his father, which he had done before him: and his heart was not perfect with the LORD his God, as the heart of David his father. So where do we learn the details? 2 Chronicles 13:1-22 gives us further evidence of Abijah’s issues. We know he i...

Ironworks

Search This Blog