Skip to main content

Apollos and Baptism

 


And a certain Jew named Apollos, born at Alexandria, an eloquent man, and mighty in the scriptures came to Ephesus. This man was instructed in the way of the Lord; and being fervent in the spirit, he spake and taught diligently the things of the Lord, knowing only the baptism of John. And he began to speak boldly in the synagogue: whom when Aquila and Priscilla had heard, they took him unto them and expounded unto him the way of God more perfectly.
Acts 18:24-26

Apollos was not always a great teacher of the church, he was wrong at one time about the Gospel Plan of Salvation. He was an eloquent man; he was mighty of the Scripture. It is certain that many denominational preachers are much like Apollos in this area: they can utter the spoken word so great, and they can recall many Scripture references and proclaim them boldly. However, a misguided understanding of baptism negates all those seemingly beneficial skills.

Some are wrong on the subjects of baptism. These will engage in infant sprinkling. The practice is from the error that babes are born sinful and they need to have sin removed in case they die. Some reject this teaching of total hereditary depravity but hold onto the same practice (i.e. Methodism). This practice does not have an origin in the church of the New Testament but the church of Rome.

Others are wrong on the mode of baptism. Instead of immersing believers, they either sprinkle or pour. The word baptizo means to immerse in the Koine Greek language in which the New Testament was written.  To immerse means to dip, plunge, to be fully engulfed in something. We can see this confirmed in many passages in the NT. We read that baptism requires water and going to that water (cf. Acts 8:36), much water (cf. John 3:23) going down into the water (cf. Acts 8:38), a burial (Rom 6:4) coming up out of the water (cf. Acts 8:39). Immersion is the only method by which all of these are achieved.

Others are wrong on the purpose of baptism. Regardless of what is written in the Scriptures, many denominational preachers insist baptism is not required for salvation. They insist that you must be baptized to become a voting member of their man-made church or partake in the Lord's Supper, but not to be a Christian. The Bible teaches that baptism is for the remission of sins (cf. Acts 2:38), it saves (cf. 1 Peter 3:21). The one who is baptized is baptized “into” Christ (cf. Rom 6:3) and into His death (cf. Rom 6:4). So this would mean I could be a Christian without having my sins remitted, without being saved, without being in Christ, and without dying sins. Friends and brethren, these are but a few examples.

Many of the members of the denominations simply need to be taught the way of God more perfectly and it is up to the church of Christ to do so. We need brethren like Aquilla and Priscilla that will open up their Bibles and their homes for those who need the way of God. Apollos was one wrong on baptism, but good brethren took the time to study with him. 

 

Grace and Peace,

Ryan

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Don't Raise an Ahaz

           Twenty years old was Ahaz when he began to reign; and he reigned sixteen years in Jerusalem: and he did not that which was right in the eyes of Jehovah his God, like David his father. But he walked in the way of the kings of Israel, yea, and made his son to pass through the fire, according to the abominations of the nations, whom Jehovah cast out from before the children of Israel.   And he sacrificed and burnt incense in the high places, and on the hills, and under every green tree . 2 Kings 16:2-4                   When was the first time you drove a car? What about the first time you jumped off a diving board or gave a speech? After that first time, it certainly became easier. What about the first lie you told? Did it become easier? King Ahaz of Judah was evil and far from the example of David. Ahaz was the first to offer child sacrifices to t...

At the Feet of Jesus

          How amazing it must have been to sit at the feet of Jesus. Have you thought much about that? What would it have been like to be around the Master? It was obviously life altering for His disciples, the majority of which (by historical accounts) would go on to violent deaths. Christians would go on to be persecuted throughout the centuries. Why? Jesus is worth the shame (Acts 5:41). Jesus is worth it all, because “there is no other name, under heaven given among men whereby we must be saved” (Acts 4:12). It is for this very reason we think about how amazing it would have been to personally sit at the feet of Jesus. To Talk to Him Must Have Been Tender           Talking to Jesus must have been so tender. We know that He would tell people what they needed to hear, and sometimes that was rather forthright (see Matt. 23), but he was loving and compassionate to those who wanted to learn from Him. Remember when parents were b...

Jehoram and Accent

          Jehoram was thirty and two years old when he began to reign, and he reigned eight years in Jerusalem. And he walked in the way of the kings of Israel, like as did the house of Ahab: for he had the daughter of Ahab to wife: and he wrought that which was evil in the eyes of the LORD.       2 Ch 21:5-6       Regional accents are quite interesting when you consider all their quirks and differences from each other. However, as one who has lived in varying locations and cultures in the United States, my accent is sort of all over the place. When I was visiting some family in Eastern Arkansas, my cousin correctly introduced me as my cousin Ryan from Texas. However, the young lady to whom he introduced me said, "You're from Texas?" I affirmed yes. To which she replied, “You don't sound like you're from Texas.” Maybe it was the fact that I grew up right on the Rio Grande or maybe this girl just e...